| 2000 vs. 2017 Per Capita Personal Income Growth and Change Lander County 2000 vs. 2017 Net Percent Change = 53.76% Rank = #1 Carson City County 2000 vs. 2017 Net Percent Change = 2.01% Rank = #17 Churchill County 2000 vs. 2017 Net Percent Change = 23.41% Rank = #7 With a spotlight on Churchill County, the chart above displays the distribution of the net percent change of real (inflation adjusted) per capita income (PCI) across Nevada's 17 counties over the period 2000-2017. Statewide Snippets:- Over 2000-2017 real PCI grew in all 17 Nevada counties.
- Real PCI growth in twelve counties outpaced the statewide average (8.86%), while growth in five counties trailed.
- At the extremes of the distribution, Lander County posted the highest growth of real PCI (53.76%), while Carson City County placed last by logging a 2.01% gain.
- The spread in real PCI growth between the highest (Lander County, 53.76%) and lowest (Carson City County, 2.01%) over 2000-2017 equated to 51.75% ( = 53.76% − 2.01%).
Churchill County Snippets:- Over 2000-2017, Churchill County posted a 23.41% net gain in real PCI.
- Churchill County was joined by eleven other counties whose real PCI growth over 2000-2017 registered above the statewide average (8.86%).
- Ranked #7 among Nevada's 17 counties, Churchill County's real PCI growth (23.41%) outperformed the statewide average of 8.86% by a 14.56% margin.
- Churchill County's net real PCI growth (23.41%, #7) over 2000-2017 registered just above that of Douglas County (23.28%, #8) and just below that of Humboldt County (23.51%, #6).
- Churchill County's real PCI as a percent of the statewide average rose from 81.61% in 2000 to 92.52% in 2017, resulting in a gain of 10.91%.
| | | | | | County Distribution of Real Per Capita Income Growth, 2000 vs. 2017 | | More
than
50% | 50%
to
40% | 40%
to
30% | 30%
to
20% | 20%
to
10% | 10%
to
0% | 0%
to
-10% | -10%
or
Below | Total | | 2000 vs. 2017 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | | | | | | | Douglas County 2017 PCI = $68,957 Percent of State = 146.79% Rank = #1 Pershing County 2017 PCI = $32,031 Percent of State = 68.18% Rank = #17 Churchill County 2017 PCI = $43,465 Percent of State = 92.52% Rank = #10 Again highlighting Churchill County's position, the bar graph above displays the disposition by county of 2017 real per capita income statewide ($46,977).  Tip: Although the visual profile of the bar chart remains unchanged you may opt to display the actual total by using the "Select Indicator" options above the graph
Statewide Snippets:- Ranked #1, Douglas County's 2017 PCI totaled $68,957, equating to 146.79% of the statewide average.
- Ranked last (#17), Pershing County's real per capita income of $32,031 in 2017 comprised just 68.18% of the total statewide. Pershing County's real per capita income in 2017 equates to just 46.4% to that of Douglas County's.
Churchill County Snippets:- Churchill County's PCI in 2017 ranked #10, amounting to 92.52% of the statewide average.
- Churchill County's PCI of $43,465 placed below that of Elko County's ($43,702, #9), and just above that of White Pine County's ($43,268, #11).
| | | | | | County Distribution of Real Per Capita Income, 2017 | | More
than
$60,000 | $60,000
to
$55,000 | $55,000
to
$50,000 | $50,000
to
$45,000 | $45,000
to
$40,000 | $40,000
to
$35,000 | $35,000
to
$30,000 | $30,000
or
Below | Total | | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 17 | | | | | | | Tip: To augment your analysis click on the column headers in the following table to rank and/or sort the data. | | | | | | Nevada Real* Per Capita Income by County:
2000 vs. 2017 | | 2000 | | 2017 | | 2000 - 2017 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 35,218 | 81.61 | | 43,465 | 92.52 | | 23.41 | 8,246 | 10.91 | | | 42,002 | 97.33 | | 45,547 | 96.96 | | 8.44 | 3,545 | -0.37 | | | 55,935 | 129.61 | | 68,957 | 146.79 | | 23.28 | 13,022 | 17.17 | | | 36,877 | 85.45 | | 43,702 | 93.03 | | 18.51 | 6,825 | 7.58 | | | 33,113 | 76.73 | | 46,841 | 99.71 | | 41.46 | 13,728 | 22.98 | | | 35,725 | 82.78 | | 39,367 | 83.80 | | 10.19 | 3,642 | 1.02 | | | 36,069 | 83.58 | | 44,550 | 94.83 | | 23.51 | 8,481 | 11.25 | | | 38,920 | 90.19 | | 59,844 | 127.39 | | 53.76 | 20,924 | 37.20 | | | 25,874 | 59.96 | | 39,313 | 83.69 | | 51.94 | 13,439 | 23.73 | | | 31,798 | 73.68 | | 37,184 | 79.15 | | 16.94 | 5,386 | 5.47 | | | 34,687 | 80.38 | | 36,536 | 77.77 | | 5.33 | 1,849 | -2.60 | | | 32,964 | 76.39 | | 35,185 | 74.90 | | 6.74 | 2,221 | -1.49 | | | 25,265 | 58.55 | | 32,031 | 68.18 | | 26.78 | 6,765 | 9.64 | | | 38,758 | 89.81 | | 54,513 | 116.04 | | 40.65 | 15,755 | 26.23 | | | 50,899 | 117.95 | | 54,729 | 116.50 | | 7.52 | 3,830 | -1.44 | | | 38,063 | 88.20 | | 43,268 | 92.11 | | 13.68 | 5,206 | 3.90 | | | 44,898 | 104.04 | | 45,801 | 97.50 | | 2.01 | 903 | -6.54 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 43,155 | 100.00 | | 46,977 | 100.00 | | 8.86 | 3,822 | 0.00 | | | 43,777 | 101.44 | | 47,155 | 100.38 | | 7.72 | 3,378 | -1.06 | | | 38,257 | 88.65 | | 45,252 | 96.33 | | 18.28 | 6,995 | 7.68 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 41,384 | | | 51,004 | | | 23.24 | 9,619 | | | | 43,392 | | | 52,884 | | | 21.87 | 9,492 | | | | 30,577 | | | 39,344 | | | 28.67 | 8,766 | |
Source: Calculations by the Nevada Regional Economic Analysis Project (NV-REAP)
with data provided by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis November 2023 REAP_PI_CA1400_YRVYR_700A | | | | | |
Tip: To augment your analysis click on the column headers in the following table to rank and/or sort the data. | | | | | | Nevada Per Capita Income by County:
2000 vs. 2017 | | 2000 | | 2017 | | 2000 - 2017 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 25,999 | 81.61 | | 43,465 | 92.52 | | 67.18 | 17,466 | 10.91 | | | 31,007 | 97.33 | | 45,547 | 96.96 | | 46.89 | 14,540 | -0.37 | | | 41,292 | 129.61 | | 68,957 | 146.79 | | 67.00 | 27,665 | 17.17 | | | 27,223 | 85.45 | | 43,702 | 93.03 | | 60.53 | 16,479 | 7.58 | | | 24,445 | 76.73 | | 46,841 | 99.71 | | 91.62 | 22,396 | 22.98 | | | 26,373 | 82.78 | | 39,367 | 83.80 | | 49.27 | 12,994 | 1.02 | | | 26,627 | 83.58 | | 44,550 | 94.83 | | 67.31 | 17,923 | 11.25 | | | 28,731 | 90.19 | | 59,844 | 127.39 | | 108.29 | 31,112 | 37.20 | | | 19,101 | 59.96 | | 39,313 | 83.69 | | 105.82 | 20,212 | 23.73 | | | 23,474 | 73.68 | | 37,184 | 79.15 | | 58.40 | 13,710 | 5.47 | | | 25,607 | 80.38 | | 36,536 | 77.77 | | 42.68 | 10,929 | -2.60 | | | 24,335 | 76.39 | | 35,185 | 74.90 | | 44.59 | 10,850 | -1.49 | | | 18,651 | 58.55 | | 32,031 | 68.18 | | 71.73 | 13,379 | 9.64 | | | 28,612 | 89.81 | | 54,513 | 116.04 | | 90.53 | 25,902 | 26.23 | | | 37,575 | 117.95 | | 54,729 | 116.50 | | 45.65 | 17,155 | -1.44 | | | 28,099 | 88.20 | | 43,268 | 92.11 | | 53.99 | 15,170 | 3.90 | | | 33,144 | 104.04 | | 45,801 | 97.50 | | 38.19 | 12,657 | -6.54 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 31,858 | 100.00 | | 46,977 | 100.00 | | 47.46 | 15,119 | 0.00 | | | 32,317 | 101.44 | | 47,155 | 100.38 | | 45.92 | 14,838 | -1.06 | | | 28,242 | 88.65 | | 45,252 | 96.33 | | 60.23 | 17,010 | 7.68 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 30,551 | | | 51,004 | | | 66.95 | 20,453 | | | | 32,033 | | | 52,884 | | | 65.09 | 20,851 | | | | 22,573 | | | 39,344 | | | 74.30 | 16,771 | |
Source: Calculations by the Nevada Regional Economic Analysis Project (NV-REAP)
with data provided by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis November 2023 REAP_PI_CA1400_YRVYR_700A | | | | | |
A Special Thanks to Our Hosts & Sponsors: | |
